Blog

Tag Archive for the 'red flags' Tag

Red Flag Compliance Deadline Extended

stopwatchThe Federal Trade Commission announced that “creditors” will not have to worry about fines associated with non compliance with Red Flag Rules until May 1st 2009. A creditor is defined as any entity that extends, renews, or continues credit and any entity that regularly arranges for the extension, renewal, or continuation of credit. For example, mortgage brokers, utility companies and automobile dealers are classified as creditors.

This decision to extend is said to be largely due to complaints from creditors that they were unaware of the existence of the new regulation and some say they only found out after the deadline had passed. This deadline according to the official press release only applies to organizations that are not under the jurisdiction of any of the other regulatory agencies other than the Federal Trade Commission. FACTA requires financial institutions and creditors to implement a written identity theft prevention program that should help detect identity theft, hopefully before any damage is done. If identity theft is not detected, the regulation calls for the financial institution or the creditor to reduce the risk to the consumer and the organization.

Continue reading "Red Flag Compliance Deadline Extended"

The Red Flag Deadline is Approaching

October 21, 2008 Posted by Michael Brooks in Industry Compliance

Although Red Flag Rules were created to protect against identity theft, are some types of businesses more affected then others? In previous blogs I wrote about how merchants are not getting a fair shake when it comes to these rules, and many law suits have been filed against merchants. Different industries face government fines because they say some of the rules are difficult to follow.

For example, car dealerships fear they will not be able to comply. Since car dealers extend auto financing, they are considered creditors. Dealerships argue that it is very difficult to detect suspicious or unusual activity, and most of their staff is not trained to look for these types of things. According to Andrew Koblenz, the National Automobile Dealers Association’s general counsel, “We want to fight identity theft, and dealers have a tremendous self-interest in not selling a car to an identity thief, but the real world impact is that it would burden dealers.” Auto dealers speculate it could add as much as five hours to the loan application process.

The healthcare industry also falls into the category of creditor. If a hospital offers payment plans so patients can pay in installments, the hospital would be considered a creditor as well. Non-profit organizations and government entities that defer payment for goods or services are also considered a creditor. For the healthcare industry, the Federal Trade Commission is responsible for interpreting and enforcing the Red Flag Rules.

Continue reading "The Red Flag Deadline is Approaching"

Is FACTA Really Fair and Accurate?

FACTA (Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003) allows consumers to be able to obtain a free credit report once every twelve months from each credit reporting agency. More importantly, the act was created to help reduce identity theft. With the state of our current economy, credit card and identity theft is on the rise. This is affecting not only consumers but merchants alike.

On November 1st 2008 FACTA has a deadline in place called the Identity Theft Red Flags Rule. Red Flags are indicators of a possible risk of identity theft. Red Flag rules listed in Section 114 of FACTA explains each rule and how to develop ID theft prevention programs. These rules apply to any business, bank, or issuer that offers credit or any type of finance option. Many financial institutions are not taking the deadline seriously since the first Office of Thrift Supervision audits will not occur until February of 2009. Merchants all together have become savvier and typically try to comply and report any red flags, but some may not know who to report these red flags to.

Although we all want our credit card information to be secure, it seems that merchants are not getting a fair shake when it comes to FACTA. Many class action lawsuits have been filed against a number of retailers. Recently, there was a class action law suit filed seeking willful damages based on printing of credit card expiration dates on receipts. The merchant was seeking $100 to $1000 for each violation. This applies to both paper and electronic receipts. Most mom and pop merchants would expect that their card processor would ensure that they are up to code. This is not always the case. Merchants should review the FACTA rules regardless of their size. The Supreme Court is currently reviewing willfulness and “reckless disregard” and expects to have a decision this quarter.